Cloud architecture by committee is always a bad idea

Cloud architecture by committee is always a bad idea

Google “design by committee,” and you won’t see anything good. The phrase is a pejorative term for a project that has many designers and no unifying plan or vision.That’s said, I’m seeing this approach more frequently these days when it comes to cloud architecture,...
Cloud architecture by committee is always a bad idea

How API gateways complement ESBs

For the modern enterprise, providing delightful customer experiences may be an all-encompassing task, but obsessing about customers is well worth the effort. Forrester research reveals that customer-obsessed companies achieve 2.5 times higher revenue growth and 2.2...
Cloud architecture by committee is always a bad idea

Red Hat ditches CodeReady name for dev environments

Red Hat has unveiled new versions of its in-browser and local development environments geared to work with the OpenShift Kubernetes platform.Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3 is the renamed, repackaged Red Hat CodeReady Workspaces, while Red Hat OpenShift Local 2 is the...
Cloud architecture by committee is always a bad idea

You’re missing the boat on cloud-native

I read an OutSystems report the other day that surprised me. According to OutSystems’ “Cloud-Native Development: Ready or Not?” report, although both Gartner and IDC predict that 90% to 95% of applications will be cloud-native by 2025, only 47% of IT decision makers...